Back to feed
Renewal·세미나 노트

Korean Cognitive Science Conference (3/3): Behavioral Economics and UX

NS
normalstory
cover image




2013 Korean Cognitive Science Conference 

3rd Call for Participation


Sogang University, Chung Ha-sang (J) Hall, 

http://CogEng.net/CogSci2013

May 25, Saturday 

Behavioral Economics and UX







The Simpsons, Homer Simpson: intuitive thinking
Star Trek, Spock: rational thinking
 -> In reality, humans are half and half

Switch: "the elephant and the rider — in the short term it looks like the rider is in control, but in the long run the elephant drags you along"

Humans as seen by economics — rational and reasonable
Humans as seen by psychology — real humans
(economics fell short on actual economic choices)

Humans have bounded rationality.
But they lean in consistent directions, which makes them predictable

Phenomena that traditional economics can't explain
  - The economy is moved by emotion.
   (mad cow beef, fear of plane crashes)
 

Why changing user behavior is hard
 - Loss aversion
 - A benefit may not feel like a benefit
 - Losses loom larger than rewards.


Why judgments are inconsistent
  - The outcome changes depending on initial settings
 - Framing effect
   (preferences shift depending on how something is presented)
 - Give a sense of having succeeded


Why user preferences change
 - Preference reversal
 - Suppressing preference reversal
    (carrot and stick)
    : discharge summaries, blog penalties
    : patient passivity — reframe from formal, doctor-initiated visits into promises patients make to themselves
 - Set up a helper who can share the goal
    : for patients with chronic illness, set goals, make feedback visible, and provide a helper so motivation keeps going
 - Self-control is a consumable resource.
   (if you set too many goals, you can't keep them up.)
    : Forcing students to set their target score, progress, and schedule before they start studying -> the self-setting premise itself was unrealistic.


A designer's problem-centered thinking
  : a tendency to zero in on the problem and analyze
    They tend to lean heavily toward rational forms of thinking.
  : What's the core problem? 
     vs the answer might be inside the problem
  : (Inferring what to do tomorrow from what was recorded yesterday) — finding answers for many patients through a small number of patients
  : High turnover among nurses — surveying not just the nurses who leave but the ones who stay. (Running mentoring or identity-reinforcement projects so they can keep their professional pride)
  -> Look for the bright spots
  : How people in the same situation solved it
  : Understanding runs deep and it doesn't come across as exclusionary

This English version was translated by Claude.

친절한 찰쓰씨
Written by
친절한 찰쓰씨

Pleasant Charles — UI/UX researcher at AIT. Keeping notes on design, planning, and slow days here since 2010.

More on the author's page

Keep reading

Renewal

Steadily, for the long haul, without burning out

Mar 31, 2026·9 min
Renewal

Tech-life balance

Feb 7, 2026·3 min
Renewal

Humanality, by Park Jeong-ryeol

Feb 7, 2026·11 min