With generative AI becoming mainstream, the design-tool market is shifting once again. There are already gaps between regions and companies in how quickly these tools are adopted. Some design teams still do not know Figma well or continue to rely mainly on Photoshop. That gap feels likely to widen even more.
Among these changes, I briefly looked around one of the now-common generative prototyping tools. "Used it" might be too strong a phrase. It was more like visiting a tasting booth than really using the product. Still, I wanted to record my first impression before the tools change again.
1. Prompt input
Human : Create a dispatch management page for parcel delivery.
Galileo bot: Understood. To design a mobile screen for parcel-delivery dispatch management, I need a few more details. Please tell me what you have in mind for the following screens:
- Delivery order list: a page showing delivery tasks assigned to drivers.
- Dispatch detail: a screen showing the details of a specific delivery order.
- Add dispatch: an input form for creating a new delivery order.
- Driver management: a screen showing a list of drivers and their current assignments.
- Dispatch status update: a screen that lets drivers manage status changes.
- Settings and support: a screen for changing app settings or receiving support.
If you have any specific requirements or extra features in mind for these items, let me know. Once the details are confirmed, I will start designing.
Human : Yes, sounds good. Please begin.
Galileo bot: The design work is complete. Here is a brief summary of each generated screen:
- Delivery order list: displays delivery tasks assigned to drivers in a clean list and lets the user move to the detail page.
- Dispatch detail: shows detailed information for a specific delivery order, including key items such as delivery status and estimated time.
- Add dispatch: a form for easily creating a new delivery order, with all required fields included.
- Driver management: a screen that gives an at-a-glance view of drivers and their current assignments.
- Dispatch status update: an interface designed so drivers can update delivery status efficiently.
- Settings and support: a screen with various options for changing app settings and receiving support.
Please check whether these designs meet the project's requirements. If any further revisions are needed, let me know and I can adjust them.
Checking the design result
If you click one of the images above, a modal opens so you can inspect the page in more detail.
1-1. Move the provided code into VS Code (IDE)
1-2. Run that code and open it in the browser
2. Import it into Figma to inspect or edit each element in detail
Uizard
For reference, the competing product Uizard shows the following result when given the same prompt.
Differences
Where the editing happens
In Galileo's case, the product is basically built around a prompt-based interface. After selecting one of the generated images, you can request edits for that particular image. For detailed editing, it provides an interface that can be copied easily into an IDE or Figma.
In Uizard's case, instead of moving into Figma, it provides tools that let the user select individual design elements from the generated result and either ask generative AI to redesign them or edit them directly.
Tasting-booth review
Personally, I found Galileo more usable than Uizard. In Uizard's case, the generated layouts feel a bit more practical and familiar, so they are slightly more detailed. But to me they also feel a bit Android-ish. Galileo feels rougher but more straightforward. There may be a little inconvenience, but because the copy-and-paste flow into other tools is so seamless, it did not actually feel that inconvenient.
Finished generating? Then edit it right here!
(Uizard)
VS
Once generation is done, go back to whatever you were doing before and keep moving.
(Galileo)
On a very personal level, both are freemium products, but... Uizard's pricing and policy are slightly irritating. The visual style is fancy and somewhat complicated. It looks soft and rounded from the outside, but once you actually try to use it, it feels heavy and blunt. Reusing work from other tools is also a little awkward. Still, this may simply be my first-impression bias. In fact, I am fairly sure that is exactly what it is.
Of course I would need to use both tools more, but for now, personally, I preferred the usability of Galileo over Uizard.
